![]() Terms "perceived" and "made known" defined test of competency of expert witness stated. Qualifications of witness and admissibility of testimony are within discretion of judge. Police officer may not give expert opinion on reasonable speed. Trial judge deemed to have made requisite findings in admitting expert testimony. Subsections (b) and (c) considered and applied qualifications of an expert considered. Kansas dental board member who testifies as an expert witness in a board disciplinary hearing may be considered a governmental employee covered by the Kansas tort claims act. 6, 10 (July 2014).Įxpert testimony of out-of-state arson investigators is admissible even though such witnesses are not licensed in Kansas. "SB 11: Say Hello to Daubert and Revised Caps, and the Collateral Source Rule Survives," David R. "The Admissibility of Expert Witness Testimony in Kansas Federal Courts," Derek S. "Turning a Blind Eye to Justice: Kansas Courts Must Integrate Scientific Research Regarding Eyewitness Testimony in the Courtroom," Bethany Shelton, 56 K.L.R. "Comparison of Federal and State Court Practice," David G. "Discovery Issues in Sedgwick County," John W. "Expert Inductive Reasoning and Frye: Weight, Not Admissibility," Chan P. "Polygraph Issues Update (Part I): "Lie-Detector" results are declared to be inadmissible in court because they are unscientific and unreliable, but polygraph use is pervasive and polygraph results are consequential," Robert Michael Beattie, Jr., J.K.T.L.A. "Evidence for the family lawyer: Intrafamily wiretapping, the Fifth Amendment and other selected topics," Steve Leben, 68 J.K.B.A. ![]() ![]() "On the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Kansas," Mark D. "Kansas' Sexual Predator Act and the Impact of Expert Predictions: Psyched Out by the Daubert Test," Clayton C. "Recent Decisions Affecting the Trial of Cases," Ruth M. "Proof Of Causation: 3 Modes For Technical Issues," Jack Peggs, 58 J.K.B.A. "A Fresh Look at Hypothetical Questions and Ultimate Issues: The Kansas Experience," Stanley D. "Accident Reconstruction Testimony by an Investigating Officer," Vol. "Settlements and Verdicts," Eugene Ralston, Vol. "Legal and Psychological Issues in the Use of Expert Testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome," Bonnie J. ![]() "The Insanity Defense in Kansas: Procedure and Practice," Jack Peggs, 53 J.K.B.A. "Survey of Kansas Law: Criminal Law," Robert A. "Survey of Kansas Law: Evidence," Mark M. "The Admissibility of Child Victim Hearsay in Kansas: A Defense Perspective," Christopher B. "Expert Testimony in Products Liability," Lynn R. "Evidence: Does the Eyewitness Really See," John Barlow Spear, 21 W.L.J. Baxendale," Wyatt McDowell Wright, 19 W.L.J. "Survey of Kansas Law: Evidence," Spencer A. Note concerning automobile accident reconstruction, 14 W.L.J. "Opinion Testimony-Where Do We Go From Here?" James A. "The Entrapment Defense in Drug Cases," Richard H. "The Locality Doctrine and the Standard of Care of a Physician," Bruce W. 167, 168, 169, 170 (1968).Ĭase note discussing testimony on hospital standards of care, 17 K.L.R. "Expertise: The Expert and the Learned Treatise," Edward G. 84, § 2 July 1.Įxpert witnesses in medical malpractice actions, see 60-3412. (d) Testimony in the form of opinions or inferences otherwise admissible under this article is not objectionable because it embraces the ultimate issue or issues to be decided by the trier of the fact. (c) Unless the judge excludes the testimony, the judge shall be deemed to have made the finding requisite to its admission. (b) If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (1) The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods and (3) the witness has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case. (a) If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to such opinions or inferences as the judge finds: (1) Are rationally based on the perception of the witness (2) are helpful to a clearer understanding of the testimony of the witness and (3) are not based on scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge within the scope of subsection (b). Testimony in form of opinion or inferences.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |